1 – Conversion of Bishop Fellay
Martin Luther and John Calvin would have been horrified at first sight by the heresies of Francis I, while we waited for our part, on 12 October 2013. Finally, it’s official, after seven months of deafening silence, Bishop Fellay said that Pope Francis is a very bad Pope conference “rebranding” River in Kansas City, commenting sermon known action of this terrible successor of Peter, delivered to gradual day (though still disappointing), official sites, while showing a change from the previously imposed changes on the way to see how Rome has changed. From 2000 until now, Rome “had changed” in the right direction without completely changed course, but now she “parts” in the wrong direction (while retaining some positive but few “changes”).
From the point of view of Menzingen is Rome “change”, not us, even when we change perspective, so that if Rome “change” again for the Tradition, as under Benedict XVI, we will change tomorrow, as we change now, in this October 12, and just like before we changed.
The problem is, because the Revolution constantly alternating destructive and conservative offers. After the rain Franciscan current Pope, will we be ready to not let ourselves be surprised by a new so-called “good weather”, so Benedict XVI? The Brotherhood does not change?
Another change of address: Bishop Fellay thank God who has preserved us to sign a canonical agreement in 2012. Yet those who have publicly spoken out against such an agreement and who persevered in the categorical refusal of it, refusing accordistes principles of Chapter 2012 in accordance with the principles enunciated by Archbishop Lefebvre (cf. book M.l ‘ Abbe Woodpecker), solemnly recognized Chapter of 2006, all these anti-accordistes madmen principles … were “thanked”.
The official version is that it is not them that have prevented the signing but Rome, June 13, 2012, made such changes in the text of the DQA, in the present circumstances, “unfortunately” (sic) Such a text would not be spent in the Brotherhood (cf. letter of June 17, 2012, Cor unum 104).
Now, no worries, we can again publicly oppose agreements unmolested. Size change compared to 2012. If the poor priests of resistance had been able to wait a year, they would still be warm. The election of ultra revolutionary François should calm their recent concerns about an agreement, but here they continue to excite the “ouaibe” mainly.
Why the priests of the Resistance and they continue their fight?
2 – The canker has he changed?
Unfortunately not, except worse, as the current papacy, by the way.
The DQA is still there in this latest speech, still intact.
You have to understand something important, I insist, and I would almost say that I am infallible about it: the Pope is infallible but can be mistaken, while Bishop Fellay is infallible even when he is wrong. (Some say, especially when he is wrong).
Thus Bishop comes to repeat for the umpteenth time in this Oct. 12, its position on the DQA. The DQA is a subtle text, understood and acceptable as a whole. He thinks that at worst, all we could blame him is to leave ambiguities could be resolved if we take the trouble to analyze the context.
Yet the ambiguities in the text are significant:
1 – Vatican illuminates the life of the Church,
2 – The new Mass is lawfully enacted
3 – The Sacraments novus ordo are valid per se ,
4 – The new code is to follow mainly
5 – The Profession of Faith of 1989 applies.
Question: are these simple ambiguities?
If the ADI contained only these unambiguous errors, it is purely wrong. The error would be easily detectable by all and the text would not be as dangerous.
The problem is the modernist ambiguity is to say that we will follow the whole Tradition, unchangeable, continuous, uninterrupted, error, insisting that it is only what we think .. . even though it tramples the same tradition a few paragraphs later.
Bishop Fellay telling anyone who will listen that he has the principle of unchanging tradition in the document header (before leaving hanging five so-called “ambiguities” that are rather obvious errors), he refuses to understand that c is mainly that which horrifies us the idea that it will use the Tradition to say such errors. “Yes, you put the tradition in the document header, but how is it possible that the tradition has made you accept such mistakes in the future, instead of you to condemn all at once?”
It is modernist thinking that the idea of tradition can be powerful to the point of giving a traditional nature frankly erroneous statements or contrary to the same tradition. Bishop Fellay refuses to see the irreducible opposition between early (doubtful) of the DQA, and five errors that follow. This refusal is much more serious (because more dangerous) than five errors themselves.
We are dealing with a disease of the mind, a failed concepts, called modernism …. And there’s many mansions in the house of modernism, one in Rome and one in Menzingen. (Small technical problem Menzingen: everyone takes the anti-modernist oath, while in Rome, we do not practice this double game)
This disease is more profound that it affects the principle of non-contradiction, and in general it is incurable at Menzingen or elsewhere.
And it is the same disease that Bishop Fellay criticizes the Pope Francis, an outrageous statement, the other almost traditional! He reproached his procrastination without realizing that the DQA “pussyfooting”, also on the same page …
Poor that we do not have the chance to understand, Bishop Fellay said that if we ask the Tradition as an absolute principle, we can then make use of subtle expressions, seemingly ambiguous (5 points) to get not error, but the tradition itself. We will never understand that the best way to combat Vatican II and its reforms, it is to recognize a certain extent … “We dare to say that there is something in Catholic Vatican II.” (17th minute sermon of 13 October 2013). Say it is modernism juxtapositionniste.
3 – Progress of the error
Under these conditions, we can not hear us, as “thank” those we have “thanked”. It is time to seek the destruction of the five new outside influence Menzingen. Admittedly, we’re a little tormented outside because it is not always easy materially and our small groups are so scattered, but peace in the hearts and the path is clear.
Meanwhile, errors Menzingen down the chain of command. The conference of Abbot Themann professor in Winona, is widely disseminated: it is the same modernism: those who think that “legitimately promulgated” means lawfully promulgated did not understand, ‘said the young priest. Under the context, “legitimately promulgated” means “promulguante legitimate authority.”
All the abbots of the Brotherhood are not in favor of the DQA, but a new way of Vatican II was born: it is interpreted, not Ratzingerian way (hermeneutic of continuity), but “traditional” way If you change what needs to be changed in its largest ambiguities in a totally traditional sense. (Interview with News France ). Our mind is unfortunately not enough to see the subtle difference between these two interpretations. (In fact, there is none).
Another thing deeply disturbing is the use of the new code of canon law. In the letters of expulsion that are distributed, the new code is even before the former. I am insured with Father Ortiz, who has been expelled, to see clearly that there are no changes since 2012.
All irregularities during the witch hunts and expulsions, as the Father Raphael OSB (which is guilty Bishop Galarreta), also show a disregard of the law as such.
Liberal pustules emerge here and there, even among colleagues we thought illiberal and, among the faithful, there is a growing worldliness and a contraceptive mentality, encouraged by those priests who recommend the natural method, intermarriage with the Ecclesia Dei the tradœcuménisme …
In places, the youth totally abandoned religious practice.
We still do not know where we are in relation to branding. What happened to the 70 million euros rothschildiens? The Brotherhood is a well recorded it under the title “Dello Sarto AG” corporation? The property of the respective districts are they now all centralized, property of the Society being used as collateral to borrow money? Krah he always seat in the intimate affairs of the fraternity? Jews are they still our “elder brothers” in the words of Bishop Fellay? The answers are all opaque.
And we do not go and tell us that we are exaggerating. Is not the first time we see a newsletter of the Society, stupidly called “the flying squirrel”, publish an entire homily of Pope Francis, in which he praised the Arrupe SJ, who was left to the point of preventing Paul VI to sleep? Is it not the first time, when Francis calls for a prayer vigil with false religions, a senior district:
– Responds to this call,
– Issuing this appeal to false religions,
– And instead of praying for repair,
asked his followers to pray for peace with the Pope at the same time or the Pope went to war in this world by trampling down the first commandment!
Finally, the many other unfortunate quotes the General Council must be retracted, one by one: cf. interview with CNS, the theory of 95% good in Vatican II, the claim that Vatican II is not a great heresy … The same goes for the six conditions of the Chapter. A human view, recovery is impossible, especially since the menzingerienne design authority that any authority can not lose face (which includes the current Rome, Bishop Fellay conference in Lille on May 7), and what is more general than is the only infallible interpreter of what he says, even if the obvious meaning of his words is poor, and even his words would be unfortunate, context come to the rescue to give them a not only unorthodox, but highly diplomatic sense. It is not out of the woods.
4 – Caritas non cogitat malum
But hey, what is true is true, even next to a mountain of pretense that I do not like to list. Bishop Fellay deals François modernist and rejoices that there is not and that there will be no agreement. He even expects a great general punishment with Williamson.
Good for the Brotherhood, hopefully it will help him shake!
If Bishop Fellay had been able to run its réconciliationistes desires, (remember the Pentecost sermon in 2012, “Rome is beautiful and good that we want to recognize”), more priests have joined us, but it would be the end of the Brotherhood. I do not think I have desired such a disaster, even to inflate the meager ranks of the resistance, but the creeping liberalism within the Brotherhood is a much more serious and more difficult to eradicate than just signing a risk canonical recognition fornicating with the new Rome.
The deadly poison of liberalism is still at work, he has won many important positions, and good, as Father Scott, are send in baboons in Zimbabwe, when they are not cleaned simply. Doctrinal line is no longer the same as before, and the modernist reasoning of the Superior General in the DQA and about the DQA does bode well.
For us the best thing is to stay outside, and never reconciled with Menzingen, as the nullam partem with heretics will not officially triumphed in the head and the members of the body profoundly sick as Menzingen refuse to understand that truth juxtaposed with an error is an error, but a total perversion of the mind , as Archbishop Lefebvre said about Vatican II.
The ultimate in modernism, is the use of the truth to get the error. Poor me, who believed that everyone had learned this Écône.
5 – Finally
“If we preach Christ, whether through envy, or whatever with a genuine zeal, I rejoice, and I will rejoice,” says the great St. Paul.
If they demolish the infamous Francis Francis shabby me, I can only rejoice. We are here, also says St. Paul, “to demolish all the buildings of the devil”, and who can deny all historical machinations of Lucifer, Modernist Rome is the largest and deserves all convictions and all possible détestations until the measure of his iniquity is full and divine wrath finally brief reference to it.
The new Rome is an insult to God, the more we will tackle them, the better. Welcome, my lord, on the outskirts of the antechamber of the area adjacent to the fold! The boat sinks a little slower, it seems. Pump as much as you can, pump water, not air, all our wishes, our prayers are with you.
In Iesu and Maria
François Chazal +