Mass Schedule #119 – Our Lady of Mount Carmel USA

Dear Friends and Benefactors,
“I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.” (Genesis 3:15)
These words, addressed to the serpent in the days which the Church seeks to bring before the minds of her children on the Feast of Saint Cyril of Alexandria (February 9), have dominated the world’s history. According to the renowned author of “The Liturgical Year”, the woman, who was the first to fall victim to Satan’s deceits, was, in Mary, the first to rise. In Her Immaculate Conception, in Her Virginal Motherhood, in Her offering of the New Adam to God on the mount of expiation, the New Eve made the enemy of mankind feel the power of Her victorious foot; and so the rebel angel, who by man’s complicity has become the prince of this world, has never ceased to direct, against the Woman who has triumphed over him, the united forces of his double empire, the legions of hell and the children of darkness.
Mary in Heaven continues the conflict she began on earth. As Queen of the Blessed Spirits and of the children of light, She leads to battle as one army the heavenly hosts and the battalions of the Church Militant. The triumph of these faithful soldiers is that of their Sovereign Lady – it is a continual crushing of the head of the father of lies by the defeat of error and the exaltation of truth, the victory of the Divine Word, Who is both Son of Mary and Son of God.
But the connection between the victory of the Divine Word and the triumph of His glorious Mother has never been more manifest than in the combats sustained by the Pontiff whom we are to honor today (February 9). Saint Cyril of Alexandria is the Doctor of the Divine Maternity, as his predecessor St. Athanasius was that of the Consubstantiality of the Word.
DOGMA OF THE INCARNATION
The dogma of the Incarnation is founded upon these two ineffable mysteries, which they confessed and defended in two succeeding centuries. As Son of God Christ must be consubstantial with the Father, for the infinite simplicity of the Divine Essence excludes all idea of division. To deny the unity of substance and principle in Jesus, the Divine Word, was to deny His Divinity. As Son of Man, as well as true God of true God, Jesus was to be born on earth of a daughter of Adam, and yet in His Humanity be still one Person with the Word. To deny the personal union of the two natures in Christ was again equivalent to denying His Divinity; it was also equivalent to declaring that the Blessed Virgin Mary, who until then had been honored as having given birth to God in the nature which He assumed for our salvation, was only the mother of a man.
Three centuries of persecution had not been able to wring from the Church a denial of the Divinity of Her Spouse. But hardly had the world witnessed the triumph of the Incarnate Word, when the enemy turned the victory to his own advantage. Profiting by the new position of Christianity and its security from public violence, he sought to win in the domain of false science the denial which had been refused him on the field of martyrdom. Apostasy did less to serve the hostile influence of the serpent and foster the growth of his accursed race than the bitter zeal of heretics for the reform of the Church’s Faith.
ARIUS AND HIS HERESY
Arius was the first of these teachers of the doctrines of Hell – a worthy first in his pride. He carried his questionings into the very depths of the Divine Essence, and rejected consubstantiality on the evidence of texts which he misunderstood. Upheld principally by the powers of this world, Arianism fell at the end of the century, having no root but its recently converted nations who had not had to shed their blood for the Divinity of the Son of God.
NESTORIUS
It was then that Satan produced Nestorius, crowned with a fictitious halo of sanctity and knowledge. This man, who was to give the clearest expression to the hatred of the serpent for the Woman, was enthroned in the See of Constantinople amid the applause of the whole East, which hoped to see in him a second St. John Chrysostom. The joy of the good was of short duration. In the very year of his exaltation, on Christmas Day 428, Nestorius, taking advantage of the immense concourse which had assembled in honor of the Virgin Mother and Her Child, pronounced from the episcopal pulpit the blasphemous words: “Mary did not bring forth God; Her Son was only a man, the instrument of the Divinity.”
The multitude shuddered with horror. Eusebius, a simple layman, rose to give expression to the general indignation, and protested against this impiety. Soon a more explicit protest was drawn up and disseminated in the name of the members of this grief-stricken Church, launching an anathema against anyone who should dare to say: “The Only-begotten Son of the Father and the Son of Mary are different Persons.” This generous attitude was the safeguard of Byzantium, and won the praise of Popes and Councils.
When the shepherd becomes a wolf, the first duty of the flock is to defend itself. It is usual and regular, no doubt, for doctrine to descend from the Bishops to the faithful, and those who are subject in the Faith are not to judge their superiors. But in the treasure of Revelation there are essential doctrines which all Christians, by the very fact of their title as such, are bound to know and defend. The principle is the same whether it be a question of belief or conduct, dogma or morals.
Treachery like that of Nestorius is rare in the Church, but it may happen that some pastors keep silence for one reason or another in circumstances when religion itself is at stake. The true children of Holy Church at such times are those who walk by the light of their Baptism, not the cowardly souls who, under the specious pretext of submission to the powers that be, delay their opposition to the enemy in the hope of receiving instructions which are neither necessary nor desirable.
SAINT CYRIL
The emotion produced by the blasphemy of Nestorius spread through the East and soon reached Alexandria. St. Cyril was then ruling the See which had been founded by St. Mark in the name of St. Peter and raised to the second place by the Head of the Church. The union of St. Athanasius and the Roman Pontiffs had overcome Arianism in the previous century, and now Rome and Alexandria were once more to unite in crushing heresy. But the enemy had learned by experience and acted with infernal foresight. When the future champion of the Mother of God was raised to the See of Athanasius, this formidable alliance was a thing of the past. Theophilus, the late Patriarch, who was the principal author of the false condemnation of John Chrysostom at the pseudo-Council of “the Oak,” had refused to subscribe to the rehabilitation of his victim by the Holy See, and Rome had been obliged to break with her eldest daughter. Cyril was the nephew of Theophilus. He knew nothing of the secret motives by which his uncle had been governed. He had been brought up to honor him as his superior, his benefactor, and his master in sacred science, and when, in his turn, he became Patriarch, he had no thought of reversing the decisions of one whom he had always regarded as a father. Alexandria remained separated from the Church of Rome.
HELP FROM A HOLY MONK
Like the serpent, whose venom poisons all that it touches, Satan turned the most noble sentiments against the cause of God; but Our Lady, who loves an upright heart, did not abandon Her champion. After a few years of mishaps, which taught him to know men, the young Patriarch had his eyes opened to the truth by a holy monk, Isidore of Pelusium. Once convinced, he did not hesitate to restore the name of John Chrysostom to the sacred diptychs. The schemes of hell came to naught. Rome found a new Athanasius on the banks of the Nile to assist her in her new combats for the faith.
Cyril, restored to Catholic unity by a monk, showed as great a devotion to the holy solitaries as his predecessor had done. He confided to them his grief at the first news of Nestorius’ impiety. The letter in which he appeals to their faith and warns them of the danger which threatens the Church has become famous. “Those,” he says, “who have embraced in Christ the noble and enviable lot which is yours, ought to shine most brilliantly with the light of a perfect and unhesitating faith, and add to this light the special radiance of virtue. Then they ought to employ their wealth in increasing in themselves the knowledge of the mysteries of Christ, and striving to understand them perfectly. This is what I think St. Paul means when he speaks of the development of the perfect man (Ephesians 4:13), the way to arrive at the measure and fullness of Christ.”(Cyril of Alexandria, Epistle 1 Ad Monach)
SAINT CYRIL VS. NESTORIUS
The Patriarch of Alexandria could not rest content with opening his heart to those of whose sympathy he was assured. He strove to win back Nestorius by letters, in which his personal meekness is only rivalled by the vigor and breadth of his doctrine. But Nestorius was obdurate. Having no arguments at his command, he complained of the Patriarch’s interference. As it always happens, there were pacifists who, though not sharing Nestorius’ errors, thought it would be best not to answer him for fear of embittering him, increasing the scandal, and wounding charity. Cyril thus answers that singular virtue which fears the affirmations of the Christian faith more than the audacity of heresy: “What! Nestorius dares to suffer men to say in public and in his presence that he who calls Mary the Mother of God is to be anathema! He hurls his anathema, through his partisans, at us, at the other Bishops of the Universal Church, and the ancient Fathers, who in all ages and all places with one accord have acknowledged and honored the holy Mother of God! And have we not the right to repay him in his own coin and say, ‘If anyone denies that Mary is the Mother of God let him be anathema’? Nevertheless, out of regard for him, I have not yet uttered these words.”
“BUT THE FAITH IS AT STAKE”
Men of this type, also represented in all ages, revealed the true motive of their hesitation when, after insisting on the advantages of peace and their ancient friendship with Nestorius, they suggested timidly that it would be dangerous to oppose so powerful an adversary. “Could I but satisfy the Bishop of Constantinople and heal the wounded spirit of my brother by suffering the loss of all my possessions!” was Cyril’s reply. “But the Faith is at stake. The scandal has spread through the Church, and all men are inquiring about the new doctrine. If we, who have received from God the office of teacher, fail to remedy such great evils, will there be flames enough for us at the Day of Judgment? I have already been struck by insult and calumny – let it pass. If only the Faith be safe, I will yield to none in my love of Nestorius. But if the Faith suffers through the deeds of some-let there be no doubt about it-I will not risk my soul even if instant death threatens me. If the fear of some disturbance is stronger than our zeal for God’s glory and prevents us from speaking the truth, how shall we dare in the presence of the Christian people to celebrate the Holy Martyrs, whose glory lies in the very fact that they carried out in their lives the words: Even unto death fight for justice?” (Ecclesiasticus 4:33)
COMBAT
When the combat became inevitable, he organized the forces of the Church, and summoned monks and Bishops to his side. He did not attempt to conceal the holy enthusiasm which filled his heart. “As far as I am concerned,” he writes to the clerics who represent him in the imperial city, “my greatest desire is to suffer, live and die for the Faith of Jesus Christ. As it is written: “If I shall give sleep to my eyes, or slumber to my eyelids, or rest to my temples” (Psalm 131:4-5) until I have fought the battle which is necessary for the well-being of all. Therefore, let your hearts be full of the same spirit and do manfully. Watch the enemy and inform us of his slightest movements. As soon as I can, I will send you some Bishops and monks, pious and prudent men, chosen out of many. I am already preparing my letters. I have resolved to labor without truce for the Faith of Christ and to suffer all torments, yes, death itself, which in such a cause would be sweet to me.” (Cyril of Alexandria, Epistle x. al. viii.)
POPE CONDEMNS HERESY
Informed of these troubles by the Patriarch of Alexandria, Pope St. Celestine I, condemned the new heresy and commissioned Cyril to depose the Bishop of Constantinople in the name of the Roman Pontiff. But Nestorius prolonged the contest by his intrigues.
SAINT PULCHERIA
At this point there appears at the side of Cyril the figure of a saintly woman, who for 40 years was the terror of Hell, and who twice crushed the head of the hateful serpent in the name of the Queen of Heaven. Pulcheria had assumed the reins of the imperial government at the age of 15. It was a time of disasters, but she arrested interior disturbances by her prudence and energy, and in union with her sisters, vowed to virginity like herself, held back the barbarian hordes by the might of divine Psalmody. While the West was in its last agony, the East, thanks to its gifted empress, was enjoying once more the prosperity of its best days.
The sight of a granddaughter of Theodosius the Great, who employed her private wealth in multiplying churches in honor of Our Lady, taught Byzantium that devotion to Mary, which was her safeguard in evil days, and which obtained for her from Mary’s Son centuries of mercy and incomprehensible patience. General Councils have hailed St. Pulcheria as the guardian of the Faith and the bulwark of unity. (Labbe, Conc. iv. 464)
St. Leo says that the greatest share in the defense of Divine Truth was hers. (Leo, Epistle 31 al. xxvii) “A double palm is in her hands,” says this great Pope, “a double crown on her head, for the Church owes to her a double victory over impiety in the persons of Nestorius and Eutyches, who from different sides tended towards the same point – the denial of the Incarnation of the Son of God and of the share of the Virgin Mother in the salvation of mankind.”
But we must overstep our limits. The summary of the life of this great Pontiff read by the Church at Matins will give us some idea of those glorious combats witnessed by the city of Ephesus when Cyril, supported by Rome and upheld by Pulcheria, established forever our Lady’s title to the most noble diadem that a mere creature can ever wear:
ROMAN BREVIARY BIOGRAPHY
“The praises of Cyril of Alexandria not only have been celebrated by individual writers, but are even registered in the acts of the Œcumenical Councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon. He was born of noble parents, and was the nephew of Theophilus, Patriarch of Alexandria. While still young he gave proofs an excellent understanding, and after having profoundly studied literature and science, he betook himself to John, Bishop of Jerusalem, to be perfected in the Christian faith. After his return to Alexandria and the death of Theophilus, he was raised to that see. In this office he kept ever before his eyes the type of the shepherd of souls described by the Apostle, and by adhering faithfully to it, earned the glory of a holy Bishop.
“He burned with zeal for the salvation of souls, and took all care to keep the flock entrusted to him in purity of faith and life, and to guard them from the poisonous pastures of heresy and infidelity. Hence, in accordance with the laws, he caused the followers of Novatus to be expelled from the city, and procured the punishment of the Jews whose hatred had led them to plan a massacre of the Christians. His eminent care for the preservation of the Catholic faith shone forth especially in his conflict with Nestorius, Bishop of Constantinople, who declared that Jesus Christ had been born of the Virgin Mary as man only, and that the divinity had been bestowed upon him because of his merits. Cyril first attempted to convert Nestorius, but when he found the task hopeless, he denounced him to Pope St. Celestine.
“As delegate of Pope Celestine, he presided over the Council of Ephesus where the Nestorian heresy was condemned, Nestorius deprived of his see, and the Catholic doctrine as to the unity of Person in Christ and the divine maternity of the glorious Virgin Mary was laid down amid the rejoicings of all the people, who escorted the bishops to their lodgings with a torchlight procession. Nestorius and his followers made Cyril the object of slanders, insults, and persecutions, which he bore with great patience, for he cared only for the purity of the faith, and took no heed of what the heretics might say or do against him. At length, after having performed great labors for the Church of God, and having composed numerous works, both in refutation of paganism and heresy and in explanation of the Catholic faith, he died a holy death in the year 444, the thirty-second year of his episcopal consecration. The supreme Pontiff Leo XIII extended to the Universal Church the Office and Mass of this most eminent champion of the Catholic faith and light of the Eastern Church.”
GUERANGER’S PRAYER AND CONCLUDING WORDS
O holy Pontiff, the heavens rejoice and the earth is glad at the thought of that conflict win which the Queen of heaven and earth chose thee as the instrument of her triumph. The East has ever honoured thee as her light; the West has long hailed thee as champion of the Mother of God, and now seeks to give stronger expression to her gratitude. A new flower has appeared in our day in Mary’s crown, and it springs from the very soil cultivated by thee. When thou didst proclaim the divine maternity in the name of Peter and Celestine thou wast preparing for Our Lady another triumph, which was to be the consequence of the first. The Mother of God must be immaculate. The definition of Pope Pius IX completes the work done by Celestine and thee. The two days – June 22, 431, and December 8, 1854 – are equally glorious in heaven, and were celebrated with like manifestations of joy and love on earth. And so, St. Cyril, the whole Church turned to thee after 14 centuries and proclaimed thee Doctor. [Pope Leo XIII extended the Feast of St. Cyril of Alexandria to the Universal Church in 1882]. She sees that thy work is complete, and will have nothing lacking in the homage rendered to thee on earth. Devotion to thee has found its fullest expression at the same time as devotion to the Mother of God. Thy glory is an extension of her glory.
We understand that the greatest honour we can pay to thee is to sing the praises of thy sovereign Lady. We therefore repeat the burning words with the Holy Ghost put upon thy lips on that day of triumph at Ephesus; “We hail thee, O Mary, Mother of God, as the bright gem of the whole creation; the lamp whose light shall never be put out, the crown of virginity, the scepter of the orthodox faith, the indestructible temple and shrine of the Infinite, through whom we have received Him whom the Gospels call Blessed, Him Who comes in the Name of the Lord. Hail Mary, whose spotless and virginal womb bore that Infinite One, by whom the Trinity is glorified and the precious Cross honoured and adored throughout the earth. Hail Mary, joy of heaven, peace of angels and archangels, terror of demons. Through thee the tempter fell from heaven, through thee the fallen are raised up to heaven. The world was held captive in idolatrous folly, and thou hast opened eyes to the truth.
To thee the faithful owe their baptism, to thee they owe the oil of gladness. Throughout all the earth thou foundest churches and leadest the nations to penance. What shall I say more? It was through thee that the only-begotten Son of God shone forth as the light of those who sat in darkness and in the shadow of death; through thee that the prophets foretold things to come; through thee that the Apostles preached salvation to the nations; through thee that the dead rise again; through thee that kings reign by the grace of the Holy Trinity. What man could ever adequately praise Mary, who is worthy of all praise? (Cyril of Alexandria, Homily 4 Ephesi habita ad St. Mariam)
If then, O Cyril, the dignity of the Mother of God surpasses all praise, beseech her to raise up among us men capable of praising her as thou didst. May the power with which she armed thee against her foes descend to those who in our days have to carry on the age-long combat between the woman and the serpent. The adversary has grown bolder. This age has surpassed in its denial of Jesus not only Nestorius, but also the apostate Emperor Julian, against whom thou didst defend the divinity of the Son of the Virgin Mother.
Thou didst rain terrible blows upon error. Teach our Doctors how to conquer; … to interest themselves in all that concerns the Church, to look upon her foes as their personal enemies, and the only real enemies they have. Our pastors will draw from thy sublime writings that true knowledge of Sacred Scripture without with their zeal would be powerless. Christians will learn from thee that they cannot grow in virtue without first increasing their Faith and their knowledge of the mysteries of the Incarnate Word. Many souls in these times content themselves with vague ideas. Let them learn from thee that it is the love of truth which leads us to life. (Cyril of Alexandria, Homily div. 1)
The approach of Lent reminds us of these Paschal Letters which at this season carried to all the announcement of the Feast of Feasts and an exhortation to penance. Our souls have grown soft. Obtain for us a sense of the seriousness of the Christian life, so that we may enter valiantly upon the holy campaign which is to win back our peace with God through the triumph of the spirit over the flesh.
APPLICATION TO TODAY’S CRISIS
Saint Cyril’s zeal for the True Faith should inspire us to fight against the evil of Modernism infecting so many souls nowadays.
Pope St. Pius X – one of the chief combatants of Liberalism and Modernism – said that the biggest enemy of the Catholic Church was not the Masons, nor the Jews, nor the Protestants, but the IGNORANCE OF CATHOLICS. As one Catholic writer put it, if the mind is sharp, then it will not led astray and it will have an answer and correct judgment and critique for all that needs to be judged and critiqued. If we live, not by Faith and reason, but by impressions, feelings and emotions, then we will be like a loose leaf in the wind – not being attached to the tree (Faith and reason), we will be blown every which way the wind blows and will dizzily follow those winds of change.

POPE PIUS X ON MODERNISM
In his famous Encyclical, Pascendi Dominici Gregis (meaning: “Of Feeding the Flock of the Lord”), Pope St. Pius very thoroughly addresses the problem of Modernism.

It is fitting and appropriate to address and also quote some sections of the holy Pope’s thoughts from his encyclical “Of Feeding the Flock of the Lord”. It might not be the diet that Catholic sheep today prefer, but it is a diet that might save them from being eaten-up by the wolves of Liberalism and Modernism.

The Pope opens the Encyclical giving reasons for its necessity and his moral obligation for writing it:

“The office divinely committed to Us of feeding the Lord’s flock has especially this duty assigned to it by Christ, namely, to guard with the greatest vigilance the deposit of the Faith, rejecting the profane novelties of words and oppositions of ‘knowledge’―which is falsely so called. There has never been a time when this watchfulness of the Supreme Pastor was not necessary to the Catholic body; for, owing to the efforts of the enemy of the human race, there have never been lacking “men speaking perverse things” (Acts 20:30), “vain talkers and seducers” (Titus 1:10), “erring and driving into error” (2 Timothy 3:13). Still, it must be confessed that the number of the enemies of the cross of Christ has, in these last days, increased exceedingly, who are striving, by arts, entirely new and full of subtlety, to destroy the vital energy of the Church, and, if they can, to overthrow utterly Christ’s kingdom itself. Wherefore We may no longer be silent, lest We should seem to fail in Our most sacred duty.”

WHAT IS OUR DUTY?
If Pope St. Pius X felt it was his duty to address this disease, then it should all the more be our duty to listen to what he says. This means we need to read – then read some more – then read again – and never stop reading! We could say that “Reading each day keeps heresy away!” Most sheep end up being eaten! Why? They do not listen to the Pastor’s or Shepherd’s voice!

MODERNIST INFILTRATION
The Pope then goes on to point-out that the enemy of Modernism has infiltrated the Church Herself – the enemy is within! “That We make no delay in this matter, is made necessary especially by the fact that the partisans of error are to be sought – not only among the Church’s open enemies – they also lie hid in Her very bosom and heart. We speak of the many who belong to the Catholic laity, and, far more lamentably, to the ranks of the priesthood itself, who, feigning a love for the Church, lacking the firm protection of philosophy and theology, and thoroughly filled with the poisonous doctrines taught by the enemies of the Church, pretend to be reformers of the Church; and attack all that is most sacred in the work of Christ, not sparing even the person of the Divine Redeemer, Whom, with sacrilegious daring, they reduce to a simple, mere man.”

OUR LADY ON INFILTRATION
Our Lady had already spoken of the Church’s infiltration at La Salette, 57 years before Pius X became pope (1903-194), and she did so once again at Akita, 59 after Pope St. Pius X died in the papacy. But even before that, Our Lady of Good Success, in the 1600’s, stated: “At the end of the 19th century and into the 20th century, various heresies will be propagated [This is around the time Pope St. Pius X begins to fight the heresy of Modernism]. As these heresies spread and dominate, the precious light of Faith will be extinguished in souls by the almost total corruption of morals … the secular clergy will leave much to be desired, because priests will become careless in their sacred duties. Lacking the divine compass, they will stray from the road traced by God for the priestly ministry, and they will become attached to wealth and riches.”

At La Salette, in 1846, Our Lady said: “The leaders of the people of God, have neglected prayer and penance … and the devil has bedimmed their intelligence. They have become wandering stars which the old devil will drag along with his tail to make them perish. God will allow the old serpent to cause divisions among those who reign in every society and in every family … Lucifer, together with a large number of demons, will be unloosed from Hell; they will put an end to Faith little by little, even in those dedicated to God … Several will abandon the Faith, and a great number of priests and members of religious orders will break away from the true religion; among these people there will even be bishops … Several religious institutions will lose all Faith and will lose many souls.”

WHAT IS A MODERNIST?
So what is a Modernist? What are the chief characteristics of a Modernist?

Pope St. Pius X, in his Encyclical Pascendi, calls them “partisans of error” and says that “they lie hid in her [the Church’s] very bosom and heart, and … who, feigning a love for the Church, lacking the firm protection of philosophy and theology, nay more, thoroughly imbued with the poisonous doctrines taught by the enemies of the Church, and lost to all sense of modesty, vaunt themselves as reformers of the Church … No one can justly be surprised that We number such men [or women] among the enemies of the Church … Moreover, they lay the axe not to the branches and shoots, but to the very root, that is, to the Faith and its deepest fibers. And having struck at this root, they proceed to disseminate poison through the whole tree, so that there is no part of Catholic truth from which they hold their hand, none that they do not strive to corrupt.”

MODERNISTS WANT CHANGE, CHANGE…
So we see from this brief description that Modernists are to be found within the Church itself, pretending to love the Church while attacking the roots of the Faith under the false pretenses of seeking beneficial reforms – “ who, feigning a love for the Church, thoroughly imbued with the poisonous doctrines taught by the enemies of the Church, vaunt themselves as reformers of the Church”― that is to say they are partisans or “gung-ho” about change, they seek to change and change and change – not just in one area, but in all areas of the Faith – never satisfied. You could almost say that “Change” is their middle name or family name. They are always questioning, criticizing, casting doubt upon, or ridiculing one aspect of the Faith or another. In other words, they are not satisfied with Tradition, which for them is archaic, antiquated, old-fashioned and obsolete. They want to modernize dogma and doctrine; they want to modernize and update moral principles and teachings; they want to modernize and update liturgical worship, introduce secular, worldly, fashionable things – they seek to align and conform the Church and Faith to the world, and not align and conform the world to the Church and Faith. They seek to go forward as pioneers and refuse (or would like to refuse) any and all authority that would seek to hold them back.

DECEITFUL AND DEVIOUS
The Modernists seek to be among the best educated, the most zealous and most esteemed persons – yet behind this façade lies a devious motive. Pope St. Pius X writes: “None is more skillful, none more astute than they, in the employment of a thousand noxious arts; for they double-up the [opposing] roles of rationalist and Catholic, and this so craftily, that they easily lead the unwary [or ‘dumbed-down’] into error. Since audacity is their chief characteristic, there is no [erroneous] conclusion of any kind from which they shrink, or which they do not thrust forward with tenaciousness and confidence. To this must be added the fact that they lead a life of the greatest activity, of assiduous and ardent application to every branch of learning, and that they possess, as a rule, a reputation for the strictest morality – which indeed is well calculated to deceive souls. They despise all authority and show no restraint; and relying upon a false conscience, they pretend to ascribe to a love of truth, which is in reality the result of pride and obstinacy.”

The Modernist is, essentially, two-faced. The Modernist professes to being a Catholic, yet mixes Catholicism with the attitudes, fashions, ideas, culture and ways of the world. The Modernist rejects Christ’s statements: “You cannot serve God and mammon!” (Saint Matthew 6:24) and says of His followers: “They are not of the world, as I also am not of the world”
(Saint John 17:16), To which Holy Scripture adds: “Adulterers, know you not that the friendship of this world is the enemy of God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of this world, becometh an enemy of God” (Saint James 4:4).

SLIPPERY AND VAGUE IN LANGUAGE
Pope St. Pius X speaks of the slipperiness and vagueness of Modernists, by which they try to avoid “being nailed” or “cornered”: “The Modernists employ a very clever artifice, namely, to present their doctrines without order and systematic arrangement into one whole, scattered and disjointed one from another, so as to appear to be in doubt and uncertainty, while they are in reality firm and steadfast.” This vagueness is truly insidiously clever – for it is vague enough to cast and sow doubts in the mind of unsuspecting (or ‘dumbed-down’) Catholics, while allowing the vagueness to permit them to protest “You misunderstand me!” when challenged, adding “That is not what I meant!”

REDUCE THE SUPERNATURAL TO THE NATURAL
Pope St. Pius X states that “Modernists place the foundation of religious philosophy in that doctrine which is usually called Agnosticism. According to this teaching human reason is confined entirely within the field of phenomena, that is to say, to things that are perceptible to the senses, and in the manner in which they are perceptible; it has no right and no power to transgress these limits. Hence it is incapable of lifting itself up to God, and of recognizing His existence, even by means of visible things. From this it is inferred that God can never be the direct object of science, and that, as regards history, He must not be considered as an historical subject.”

This means that the Modernist will not accept any arguments, proofs, reasonings, theories that are not based upon the tangible facts, sensory perceptions, and which do not fit in with the various sciences. He will not accept anything that cannot be measured, physically or historically or scientifically proved. He reduces the divine to mere human levels and rejects all other truths that cannot be humanly measured, understood or proved. In a nutshell, it is like a 7-year-old refusing all teaching and knowledge that is above his comprehension. The Modernist’s jargon will include phrases like: “Prove that! There is no scientific proof! Science says that … blah, blah, blah! There are no historical records for that!” etc., etc..

THE HISTORICAL JESUS VS. JESUS OF THE GOSPELS
This means the Scriptures are not necessarily reliable from an historical perspective, according to the Modernist. For example, the Modernist would say that Jesus may not have truly risen from the dead. According to this view, the Resurrection mentioned in Scripture was essentially the way the Apostles chose to communicate the belief that Jesus continues to live in our hearts after His crucifixion. This is completely at odds with St. Paul, who said, “And if Christ be not risen again, your Faith is vain, for you are yet in your sins” (1 Corinthians 15:17).

The Modernist is also at odds with the strict and severe God of the Old Testament, sweeping Him under the carpet, or stuffing Him in the closet, and replacing Him with an all-loving, endlessly forgiving, all saving God.

FOR MODERNISTS, RELIGION IS ABOUT FEELINGS
For the Modernist, religion is essentially about what makes you feel good; if Christianity, or any other religion, is what makes you feel good and more in touch with the Divine, then it is true for you. In other words, religion does not consist of creeds or objective truth, but of feelings. Modernists fail to accept that religious truth is NOT subjective, but is found only in Jesus Christ and His Church. For the Modernist, truth changes. He will not deny that what Jesus said, way back when, was true – but it was only true for that time sphere. Today it is no longer true, or only partially true.

THE MODERNIST IS A SOWER OF DOUBT
The Modernist leans heavily on Agnosticism, which is defined as “the doctrine that the existence or nature of any ultimate reality is unknown and probably unknowable, or that any knowledge about matters of ultimate concern is impossible or improbable; specifically that the doctrine that God or any first cause is unknown and probably unknowable.” The Atheist will say “There is no God!” The Agnostic will say: “There might be a God, there might not be a God! We cannot know for certain!” Agnosticism is a creed of doubting and the Modernist is always casting doubt on Church teachings – the only thing Modernism will not doubt, is itself. “We shall believe this for now! Later we might believe something different! What was true yesterday is no longer true today; and what is true today may not be true tomorrow! Gotta keep with the times! Gotta adapt to the times!” Change, change, change!

FOR MODERNISTS, DOCTRINE EVOLVES
The Modernist says that in previous centuries, the dogmas of the Faith, such as the dogmas of the Trinity, were true, but since dogma evolves, it may no longer be true today. For the Modernist, dogma evolves into whatever accommodates the needs of the current culture. This is refuted by the fact that the dogmas of the Faith are revealed by God, and God cannot contradict Himself.

Orthodox terminology is maintained, but the definitions of the terms are changed. Words like “God,” “Resurrection,” “Trinity,” “Faith” “Sin” and “salvation” are all used by the Modernist, but what they mean by these terms has changed and has little or nothing to do with what these terms have traditionally meant in the history of the Church.
For this reason, Modernists may appear to be orthodox, but one eventually discovers their true nature once they dig more deeply into the meaning of the terminology they use. This view of dogma was refuted by the First Vatican Council (1869-1870): “Hence, too, that meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be maintained which has once been declared by holy mother church, and there must never be any abandonment of this sense under the pretext or in the name of a more profound understanding” (On Faith and Reason, 14).
PERSEVERANCE IS A VIRTUE
Therefore, by imitating the great zeal of Saint Cyril of Alexandria, let us persevere in our battle against today’s global disease, Modernism, assisted with prayer (especially the daily Rosary) and penance during this holy Season of Lent.

AVE MARIA!
Father Joseph Poisson

Consecration of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel to Immaculate Heart of Mary
http://ourladyofmountcarmelusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Consecration-to-Immaculate-Heart-by-Our-Lady-of-Mt.-Carmel-SSPX-Marian-Corps.pdf

Featured Sermon
Given By His Excellency Bishop Pfeiffer

Posted in Newsletters and tagged Father Joseph Poisson, February 2024, Newsletter